Under Construction

Supreme Court Web page (www.supremecourtus.gov)

Justices Ranked from more liberal to more conservative. See MQ scores below.
Name State Appointed Law School Prior Religion
Yr Pres
John Paul Stevens Retiring Illinois 1975 Ford Northwestern Protestant
Ruth Bader Ginsburg New York 1993 Clinton Harvard Appeals court Jewish
Stephen G. Breyer Massachusetts 1994 Clinton Harvard Appeals court Jewish
Sonia Sotomayor New York 2009 Obama Yale Appeals court Catholic
Elena Kagan
(nominee)
New York 2010 Obama Harvard Solicitor General Jewish
Anthony M. Kennedy California 1988 Reagan Harvard Catholic
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice Maryland 2005 Bush, G. W. Harvard Appeals court Catholic
Samuel Alito New Jersey 2006 Bush, G. W. Yale Appeals court Catholic
Antonin Scalia Virginia 1986 Reagan Harvard Appeals court Catholic
Clarence Thomas Georgia 1991 Bush, G. H. W. Yale Appeals court Catholic
Listed by MQ "Martin-Quinn" scores developed by political scientists Andrew Martin (Washington University) and Kevin Quinn (UC Berkeley School of Law) to measure "the relative location of each U.S. Supreme Court justice on an ideological continuum."
Note: Justice Sotomayor was new and didn't have a score when we last updated this, so she was placed where general opinion thought she would fit.


In an April 18, 2010, NY Times Article, Supreme Court Memo - Why Newer Appointees Offer Fewer Surprises they point out:
"A 2007 study by Professor Segal and three other scholars - Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin and Kevin M. Quinn - found that all but 4 of the 26 justices who have served for at least 10 years since 1937 changed over time. "Twelve moved to the left, seven to the right and three in more exotic ways," the study concluded.

This is less true of recent appointees. Nominees' backgrounds these days often include work for the executive branch in Washington and substantial service on a federal appeals court, so more is know about how they might handle federal issues.

Justin Driver, a law professor at the University of Texas, has a theory about why that might be so. "It's the friends factor," he said. Conservatives with established social networks in Washington, he said, are less likely than newcomers to be swayed by the city's relatively liberal political culture. "In the conservative imagination," Professor Driver said, "there is an idea that Republican-appointed justices are worn down by Georgetown dinner parties."

See: Ideological Drift Among Supreme Court Justices: Who, When, And How Important?, by Lee Epstein, Andrew D. Martin, Kevin M. Quinn & Jeffrey A. Segal* at the Northwestern University Law Review


A recent controversial decision was: "Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission", (2010):
The court ruled that the government may not ban political spending by corporations in candidate elections, based on the First Amendment.
Majority - Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Thomas.
Dissent - Stevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
The dissenting justices did support Part IV which upheld the disclosure, disclaimer, and reporting requirements. Thomas did not support Part IV.

Links:
Supreme Court Memo - Why Newer Appointees Offer Fewer Surprises - NYTimes.com
The Ideological History of the Supreme Court of the U.S. - TargetPoint
Biographies (pdf)
Supreme Court Justices Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Cases 1937-1994, Professor Timpone - Ohio St.
Famous Trials and Supreme Court Decisions
The Constitution - Amendments - Major Acts of Congress
Supreme Court at us.gov
The Self-Correcting U.S. Supreme Court, by Bruce A. Desmarais University of North Carolina
Biographies

Return toPolitics

last updated 25 Mar 2010