Year President Senate House Spending 1.
Dem Rep % of GDP Increase
2011 Obama D-53 45% 55%
2009 Obama D - 55*** 59% 41% 25.3% 16.2%
2007 G.W. Bush D - 51** 54% 46% 22.7% 20.7%
2005 G.W. Bush R - 55 47% 53% 19.6% 13.0%
2003 G.W. Bush R - 51 47% 53% 19.4% 14.2%
2001 G.W. Bush D* 49% 51% 19.1% 14.2%
1999 Clinton R - 55 49% 51% 18.0% 8.9%
1997 Clinton R - 55 48% 52% 18.5% 6.1%
1995 Clinton R - 52 47% 53% 19.6% 6.2%
1993 Clinton D - 57 59% 41% 20.5% 6.7%
1991 H.W. Bush D - 56 61% 39% 21.5% 8.3%
1989 H.W. Bush D - 55 60% 40% 21.9% 16.7%
1987 Reagan D - 55 59% 41% 20.9% 10.7%
1985 Reagan R - 53 58% 42% 21.7% 10.9%
1983 Reagan R - 54 62% 38% 22.1% 15.7%
1981 Reagan R - 53 56% 44% 22.9% 22.4%
1979 Carter D - 58 64% 36% 21.4% 31.8%
1977 Carter D - 61 67% 33% 19.8% 23.3%
1975 Ford D - 60 67% 33% 20.3% 29.8%
1973 Ford D - 56 56% 44% 19.1% 26.3%
1971 Nixon D - 54 59% 41% 18.2% 17.4%
1969 Nixon D - 57 56% 44% 18.7% 12.2%
1967 Johnson D - 64 57% 43% 19.1% 23.9%
1965 Johnson D - 68 68% 32% 18.0% 23.3%
1963 Johnson D - 66 60% 40% 17.2% 8.5%
1961 Kennedy D - 64 60% 40% 18.1% 7.9%
1959 Eisenhower D - 65 65% 35% 18.9% 12.6%
1957 Eisenhower D - 49 53% 47% 18.4% 13.8%
1955 Eisenhower D - 48 53% 47% 17.6% 4.4%
1953 Eisenhower R - 48 51% 49% 19.1% -0.3%
1951 Truman D - 49 54% 46% 20.5% 61.7%
1949 Truman D - 54 60% 40% 14.8% 23.7%
1947 Truman R - 51 43% 57% 14.8% -29.8%
1945 Truman D - 57 56% 44% 14.8% -29.8%

* There were 50 Ds and 50 Rs until May 24, 2001, when Sen. James Jeffords (R-VT) switched to Independent status, effective June 6, 2001; he announced that he would caucus with the Democrats, giving the Democrats a one-seat advantage.

** Independent Sen. Bernard Sanders (VT) gives the Democrats a one-seat majority.

*** Two Independents and two vacancies (IL and MN)

1. Spending is based on the average budget established in the year shown and followng year and actual spending in the following two years.
E.g. 2007 spending was the average for the Bush 2007 and 2008 budgets spent in 2008 and 2009.
The 2008 budget including Bush's bail outs and wars was 25% of GDP, an 18% increase from $3.0 to $3.7 trillion. The 2009-10 budgets were a 4.3% increase over the last Bush budget.

Increase is in actual $ not percent of GDP.

It is difficult to place responsibility for spending in a transition year. For example the 2009 budget established in 2008 was around 3 trillion, however additional spending [ the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) -$245 M; American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) - $100 M; and increases in primary budget categories such as Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance, Social Security, and Defense - $185 M] drove actual spending in 2009 over $3.5 trillion.

Spending sometimes lags legislation by years. For example the Health Care Reform bill signed by the president in March 2010 has provisions which don't take effect until 2014 and 2015.

Many people think that Reagan reduced the size of government based on the conservative movement that swept him into office.
After one failed attempt to reduce Social Security spending in 1981, he never seriously challenged federal spending again. He increased total spending 57% and the national debt by 161% from $994 billion to $2.6 trillion. Debt as a percent of GDP went up 59%.

Clinton on the other hand increased spending by 27% and the national debt by 29%. Debt as a % of GDP went down 12%.

Sources: A Visual Guide To The Balance of Power In Congress, 1945-2008 - uspolitics.about.com
Federal Spending at USGovernmentSpending.com
Budget of the United States Government: Historical Tables at GPOaccess.gov

Links:
U.S. Budget - Spending - Deficit - Taxes
Presidential Ratings

Return toPolitics

last updated 18 Dec 2010